![]() Huang, Hydrodynamic performance of a T-shaped floating breakwater, Applied Ocean Research, vol. Badri, Experimental study of wave attenuation in trapezoidal floating breakwaters, China Ocean Engineering, vol. Ma, Performance of an F-type floating breakwater: A numerical and experimental study, Journal Engineering for the Maritime Environment, vol. Zeraatgar, Parametric comparison of rectangular and circular pontoons performance as floating breakwater numerically, Polish Maritime Research, vol. Chou, Analysis of responses of floating dual pontoon structure. Kawasaki, Numerical modeling of dynamic responses and mooring forces of submerged floating breakwater. Sundaravadivelu, Mooring forces and motion responses of pontoon-type floating breakwaters. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, vol. Mani, Performance of cage floating breakwater. Stiassnie, A simplified analytical model for a floating breakwater in water of finite depth. Mani, Design of Y-frame floating breakwater. Duan, Review of recent research and development on floating breakwaters. Sawaragi, Coastal Engineering: Waves, Beaches, Wave-structure Interactions. ![]() 13 of the permanent committee II, Supplement to Buletin 85, Brussel, 1994. PIANC, Floating breakwater: A practical guide for design and construction. ![]() Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, 1981.ī. Hales, Floating Breakwater: State of the art Literature Review. Army, Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, 1976. Christensen, Floating Breakwater Field Assessment Program, Friday Harbor, Washington. Richey, Wave transmission tests of floating breakwater for Oak harbor. Civil Engineering Laboratory, Naval Construction Battalion Center, 1978. Jones, An assessment of transportable breakwaters with reference to the container offloading and transfer system (COTS). Armono, Wahyudi, Dynamic behavior analysis of porous saw floating breakwater under regular waves, In Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Ocean and Coastal Engineering, Environmental and Natural Disaster Management, ISOCEEN, Surabaya, Indonesia, pp. Floating breakwater with 5% porosity causes an increasing value on the transmission coefficient as 5% and decreases the reflection coefficient value at 8-10% for 45° and 60° slopes respectively.Ĭopyright © 2022 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved. ![]() On the other hand, the porosity has put an effect on transmission and reflection coefficient as well. The result shows that the larger the slope is, the larger the value of the hydrodynamic coefficients is. At 5% of porosity, the same improving behavior of transmission and reflection coefficient has been investigated at 2,95% and 27,22% for slope changing as 15° (from 45° to 60°). The slope has caused an increasing value of the average transmission and reflection coefficient at 3.85% and 21.67%, respectively for floating breakwater without porosity. Moreover, the best transmission coefficient value has been found at 60o slope and 5% porosity combination, since the porous-shaped structure has caused large wave dissipation. Under conditions of low wave parameters, the transmission coefficient is higher compared to the high wave parameter. The performance of floating breakwater has been evaluated on transmission and reflection coefficient. The variations have been applied in wave height, wave period, and mooring angle. In this study, five physical models of the porous-slope floating breakwater have been tested on regular waves in a wave flume. Floating breakwater is an alternate solution to traditional breakwaters that can be applied effectively in coastal zones with a moderate wave. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |